2006 Proton Gen-2 vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Proton Gen-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Proton Gen-2 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (510 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 402 more horse power than 2006 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2006 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (624 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 476 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Proton Gen-2 | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Proton | Land Rover |
| Model | Gen-2 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 510 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 624 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4973 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2035 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1877 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2891 mm |
