2006 Renault Clio vs. 1946 Simca 5
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Simca 5 would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (74 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1946 Simca 5. (14 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1946 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 595 kg more than 1946 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Renault Clio | 1946 Simca 5 | |
| Make | Renault | Simca |
| Model | Clio | 5 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1946 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1149 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 14 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |
