2006 Renault Clio vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (74 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 180 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Clio | 1952 Saab 92 | |
Make | Renault | Saab |
Model | Clio | 92 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 24 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2480 mm |