2006 Renault Clio vs. 1958 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,451 cc, 1958 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1958 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1958 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 180 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Renault Clio | 1958 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Clio | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1451 cc |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2540 mm |
