2006 Renault Clio vs. 1967 Zastava 1500

To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (74 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 5 kg more than 1967 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Clio (106 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Zastava 1500.

Compare all specifications: