2006 Renault Clio vs. 1970 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 175 kg more than 1970 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Renault Clio | 1970 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Renault | Zastava |
| Model | Clio | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2010 mm |
