2006 Renault Clio vs. 1972 Seat 127
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Seat 127 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1972 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1972 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 325 kg more than 1972 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Seat 127. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Clio | 1972 Seat 127 | |
Make | Renault | Seat |
Model | Clio | 127 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 902 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2230 mm |