2006 Renault Clio vs. 1974 TVR M
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 TVR M would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 TVR M is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 135 kg more than 1974 TVR M.
Because 1974 TVR M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 TVR M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Renault Clio | 1974 TVR M | |
| Make | Renault | TVR |
| Model | Clio | M |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 895 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2290 mm |
