2006 Renault Clio vs. 1974 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1974 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1974 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 555 kg more than 1974 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Renault Clio | 1974 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Renault | Zastava |
| Model | Clio | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
| Engine Size | 2946 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7150 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2010 mm |
