2006 Renault Clio vs. 1975 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1975 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1975 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 215 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1975 Triumph 2000 (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1975 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Clio | 1975 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Renault | Triumph |
Model | Clio | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2700 mm |