2006 Renault Clio vs. 1979 Seat Ritmo

To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Seat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (74 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1979 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 275 kg more than 1979 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Clio (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Seat Ritmo.

Compare all specifications: