2006 Renault Clio vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 260 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Renault Clio | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Renault | Zastava |
| Model | Clio | 102 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2160 mm |
