2006 Renault Clio vs. 1986 Acura Integra
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Acura Integra (113 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Renault Clio | 1986 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Renault | Acura |
| Model | Clio | Integra |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 113 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4355 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2520 mm |
