2006 Renault Clio vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Aerostar (99 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 380 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Clio | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | Clio | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3030 mm |