2006 Renault Clio vs. 1989 Rover 216

To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Rover 216. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Rover 216 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Rover 216 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Rover 216 (114 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Rover 216 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Rover 216 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Rover 216 (141 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1989 Rover 216 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Renault Clio 1989 Rover 216
Make Renault Rover
Model Clio 216
Year Released 2006 1989
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1390 cc 1590 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 97 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6300 RPM
Torque 127 Nm 141 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 5200 RPM
Top Speed 180 km/hour 193 km/hour
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 1080 kg
Vehicle Length 3780 mm 4230 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2550 mm