2006 Renault Clio vs. 1991 Volvo 245
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Volvo 245 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1991 Volvo 245. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1991 Volvo 245.
Because 1991 Volvo 245 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Volvo 245. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Volvo 245 (143 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (127 Nm). This means 1991 Volvo 245 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Clio | 1991 Volvo 245 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Clio | 245 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 143 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2660 mm |