2006 Renault Clio vs. 1995 Saturn SC
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Saturn SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Saturn SC would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Saturn SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Saturn SC (122 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Saturn SC should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 135 kg more than 1995 Saturn SC.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Saturn SC (168 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Saturn SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Clio | 1995 Saturn SC | |
Make | Renault | Saturn |
Model | Clio | SC |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 168 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |