2006 Renault Clio vs. 1996 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 1,839 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Suzuki Baleno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Suzuki Baleno (119 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Baleno should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Suzuki Baleno weights approximately 100 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Suzuki Baleno (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (106 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Suzuki Baleno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Clio | 1996 Suzuki Baleno | |
Make | Renault | Suzuki |
Model | Clio | Baleno |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2490 mm |