2006 Renault Clio vs. 1997 Suzuki C2
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Suzuki C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Suzuki C2 (251 HP) has 177 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 137 kg more than 1997 Suzuki C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (106 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1997 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Renault Clio | 1997 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | Renault | Suzuki |
| Model | Clio | C2 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 251 HP |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 848 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2240 mm |
