2006 Renault Clio vs. 1999 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 235 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Mazda AZ has automatic transmission and 2006 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2006 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mazda AZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Clio | 1999 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Renault | Mazda |
Model | Clio | AZ |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2370 mm |