2006 Renault Clio vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (245 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 436 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (300 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Clio | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 7150 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 94.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1846 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 87 L |