2006 Renault Clio vs. 2005 Toyota Opa
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Opa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Opa would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Opa is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Opa weights approximately 170 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.
Because 2005 Toyota Opa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Opa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Clio | 2005 Toyota Opa | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Opa |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1530 mm |