2006 Renault Clio vs. 2005 Zastava 103
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Zastava 103. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Zastava 103 would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Zastava 103 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (74 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Zastava 103. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2005 Zastava 103. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 65 kg more than 2005 Zastava 103. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Clio (106 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Zastava 103. (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Zastava 103.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Renault Clio | 2005 Zastava 103 | |
| Make | Renault | Zastava |
| Model | Clio | 103 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 106 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2510 mm |
