2006 Renault Clio vs. 2009 Volvo S40

To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S40 (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S40 (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio. 2009 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 2006 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2006 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Renault Clio 2009 Volvo S40
Make Renault Volvo
Model Clio S40
Year Released 2006 2009
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1390 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 166 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 127 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 4400 RPM
Top Speed 180 km/hour 215 km/hour
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1460 mm