2006 Renault Clio vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (194 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Clio (215 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 2006 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Clio | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Renault | Holden |
Model | Clio | Cruze |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 194 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 215 Nm | 153 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2685 mm |