2006 Renault Grand Scenic vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 480 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Grand Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Grand Scenic | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Renault | Triumph |
Model | Grand Scenic | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |