2006 Renault Grand Scenic vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Grand Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 795 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Renault Grand Scenic | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Renault | Zastava |
| Model | Grand Scenic | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2010 mm |
