2006 Renault Grand Scenic vs. 2005 Spyker C8
To start off, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 485 kg more than 2005 Spyker C8.
Because 2005 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Grand Scenic | 2005 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Renault | Spyker |
Model | Grand Scenic | C8 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 100 L |