2006 Renault Grand Scenic vs. 2009 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Renault Grand Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Renault Grand Scenic would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 229 more horse power than 2006 Renault Grand Scenic. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Grand Scenic.

Because 2009 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Grand Scenic. (191 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Grand Scenic. 2006 Renault Grand Scenic has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Renault Grand Scenic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: