2006 Renault Kangoo vs. 1982 Seat Ritmo

To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Kangoo (74 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Kangoo weights approximately 820 kg more than 1982 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Kangoo (114 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Kangoo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ritmo.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Renault Kangoo 1982 Seat Ritmo
Make Renault Seat
Model Kangoo Ritmo
Year Released 2006 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1389 cc 1196 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 74 HP 63 HP
Torque 114 Nm 92 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1700 kg 880 kg
Vehicle Length 4000 mm 3950 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1810 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2460 mm