2006 Renault Kangoo vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Renault Kangoo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Renault Kangoo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 263 more horse power than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Kangoo.
Because 2006 Renault Kangoo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Kangoo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 381 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (149 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Kangoo | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Renault | Holden |
Model | Kangoo | UTE |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Panel Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 149 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |