2006 Renault Laguna vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Renault Laguna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Renault Laguna would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-150 (310 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2006 Renault Laguna. (204 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Laguna.
Because 2010 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Renault Laguna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-150 (494 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Laguna. (280 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Laguna.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Laguna | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | Laguna | F-150 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 494 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5611 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2192 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1991 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3378 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 98 L |