2006 Renault Logan vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Renault Logan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Renault Logan would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Cooper weights approximately 129 kg more than 2006 Renault Logan.
Because 2013 Mini Cooper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mini Cooper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Logan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Cooper (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Logan. (112 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Cooper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Logan.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Logan | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Renault | Mini |
Model | Logan | Cooper |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3723 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1407 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |