2006 Renault Megane vs. 2010 Holden Epica

To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Renault Megane. (133 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Megane.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Megane. (191 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Megane. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2006 Renault Megane has manual transmission. 2006 Renault Megane will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Renault Megane 2010 Holden Epica
Make Renault Holden
Model Megane Epica
Year Released 2006 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1991 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 133 HP 148 HP
Torque 191 Nm 320 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4360 mm 4805 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2530 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.2 L/100km 7.5 L/100km