2006 Renault Scenic vs. 1968 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2006 Renault Scenic is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Scenic (161 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Scenic weights approximately 491 kg more than 1968 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Scenic (270 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: