2006 Renault Scenic vs. 1982 Seat Ronda
To start off, 2006 Renault Scenic is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ronda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ronda would be higher. At 1,869 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Scenic (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ronda. (61 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Scenic (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ronda. (88 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ronda.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Scenic | 1982 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Renault | Seat |
Model | Scenic | Ronda |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1869 cc | 1193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 61 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 67.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2460 mm |