2006 Renault Scenic vs. 1997 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Renault Scenic is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 2,980 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Toyota 4Runner (123 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Renault Scenic. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Scenic.
Because 1997 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Renault Scenic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Scenic (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Toyota 4Runner. (295 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Scenic | 1997 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Scenic | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1869 cc | 2980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.3:1 | 21.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |