2006 Renault Scenic vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Renault Scenic is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2006 Renault Scenic. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Scenic.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Scenic. (300 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Scenic | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Scenic | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1869 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 87 L |