2006 Renault Scenic vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Renault Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Renault Scenic would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Scenic (132 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 81 kg more than 2006 Renault Scenic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Scenic. (191 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Renault Scenic | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Scenic | C30 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 191 Nm | 270 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |