2006 Rover 25 vs. 2005 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2006 Rover 25 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2006 Rover 25. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 530 kg more than 2006 Rover 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 25. (123 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Rover 25 | 2005 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Rover | Suzuki |
Model | 25 | XL7 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 2737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |