2006 Rover 25 vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 25 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2006 Rover 25. (83 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 25.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 25. (110 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Rover 25 | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Rover | Renault |
Model | 25 | Megane |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |