2006 Rover 25 vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 25 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 624 kg more than 2006 Rover 25.
Because 2013 Ferrari California is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ferrari California. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Rover 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 394 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 25. (110 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Rover 25 | 2013 Ferrari California | |
| Make | Rover | Ferrari |
| Model | 25 | California |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 504 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 77 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1709 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4562 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1308 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 78 L |
