2006 Rover 45 vs. 1955 Singer Hunter
To start off, 2006 Rover 45 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 1,992 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Rover 45 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 45 (100 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1955 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 45 should accelerate faster than 1955 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Rover 45 weights approximately 159 kg more than 1955 Singer Hunter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Singer Hunter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Singer Hunter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Rover 45, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Rover 45 | 1955 Singer Hunter | |
| Make | Rover | Singer |
| Model | 45 | Hunter |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 1992 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1146 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2180 mm |
