2006 Rover 45 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2006 Rover 45 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Rover 45. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 45. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Rover 45 weights approximately 41 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 45. (160 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Rover 45 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Rover | Triumph |
Model | 45 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.3 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1236 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |