2006 Rover 75 vs. 1972 Volvo 164

To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1972 Volvo 164. (156 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1972 Volvo 164.

Because 1972 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Volvo 164. (241 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Volvo 164.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Rover 75 1972 Volvo 164
Make Rover Volvo
Model 75 164
Year Released 2006 1972
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4601 cc 2978 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 256 HP 156 HP
Torque 245 Nm 241 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90.2 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 10.1:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4720 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 60 L