2006 Rover 75 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (175 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Rover 75 weights approximately 535 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Rover 75 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Rover | Zastava |
Model | 75 | 102 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2160 mm |