2006 Rover 75 vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura CL would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura CL (200 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2006 Rover 75. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Acura CL weights approximately 275 kg more than 2006 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Rover 75 | 1998 Acura CL | |
| Make | Rover | Acura |
| Model | 75 | CL |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2495 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2715 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 65 L |
