2006 Rover 75 vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2005 Rover 75. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2005 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Rover 75 | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Rover | Rover |
Model | 75 | 75 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1796 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.2:1 |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.6 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.4 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 65 L |