2006 Rover 75 vs. 2008 Saab 9-7X
To start off, 2008 Saab 9-7X is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 75 would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Saab 9-7X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Saab 9-7X (300 HP) has 125 more horse power than 2006 Rover 75. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Saab 9-7X should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 75.
Because 2008 Saab 9-7X is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Saab 9-7X will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Saab 9-7X (435 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Saab 9-7X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Rover 75 | 2008 Saab 9-7X | |
Make | Rover | Saab |
Model | 75 | 9-7X |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 435 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 83 L |