2006 Rover 75 vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 75 would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (294 HP) has 119 more horse power than 2006 Rover 75. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 205 kg more than 2006 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Rover 75 | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Rover | Kia |
Model | 75 | Cadenza |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 3300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 294 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2845 mm |